homeexamplesiso-27001-vs-soc-2

ISO 27001 vs SOC 2: Which Should Your Business Prioritize?

Published Jan 7, 2025
β‹…
2 minutes read

Having been part of a business going through security certifications and spending considerable time researching this space, I've seen firsthand how organizations grapple with choosing between ISO 27001 and SOC 2. It's a complex decision that affects every part of the business, and I want to share what I've learned from being in the trenches and studying these frameworks.

iso27001 vs soc2
Comparison of key information security compliance frameworks

Understanding the Basics

One of the first things I learned when our company started exploring these certifications is that ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aren't competitors - they're complementary frameworks serving different purposes. ISO 27001 focuses on overall information security management, while SOC 2 is specifically designed for service providers handling customer data. I've watched companies spin their wheels trying to choose between them when they often need both.

Market Drivers: Who's Asking For What?

From what I've observed working in the UK tech sector, your choice often comes down to your target market. ISO 27001 is practically mandatory for doing business in the EU - it's the go-to standard for information security management and regularly appears in tender requirements. However, when working with American tech companies, SOC 2 tends to dominate vendor security assessments.

markets
Prioritization depends on the target market

Resource Requirements and Implementation Reality

Being around during implementation highlighted just how different these certifications are in practice. When our organization worked on ISO 27001, it was a comprehensive change that touched every department. The Information Security Management System (ISMS) implementation affected everyone from HR to IT, and watching this unfold gave me a deep appreciation for the scope of such projects.

SOC 2, from what I've researched and observed, tends to be more focused on specific services and systems. While it might be less disruptive to implement, it requires meticulous evidence of control effectiveness over time. The audit process involves a Type 1 (point-in-time) audit followed by a Type 2 audit that usually covers 6-12 months of operation.

Cost Considerations

Based on my research and observations, here's how the costs typically break down:

ISO 27001:

SOC 2:

process
Source: secureframe.com/blog/soc-2-vs-iso-27001

What I've Learned About Choosing

From my experience and research, here's how businesses typically decide their starting point:

Start with ISO 27001 if:

Start with SOC 2 if:

The Hybrid Approach

One interesting pattern I've noticed is that organizations that eventually get both certifications often start with ISO 27001. This makes sense - having watched this process unfold, I've seen how having an ISMS in place creates a strong foundation. Many of the controls and processes required for SOC 2 are already there, along with the documentation to prove it.

Looking Ahead

Something that became very clear from being part of this process is that neither certification is a one-time achievement. They require ongoing commitment and resources to maintain. However, there's a silver lining - once you have one framework in place, adding the other becomes significantly easier.

The key insight I've gained is that these certifications shouldn't be viewed as competing priorities but as tools in your security arsenal. Whether you start with ISO 27001 or SOC 2, you're building a foundation for robust information security practices that will serve your business well into the future.